Browse 3D printers instore in Manhattan

You might have noticed I’m obsessed with the potential of 3D Printers. Back in August 2011, I broke a personal rule about putting times on predictions, and wrote ‘2012 – the year of  3D Printing‘, which proved a popular point of view and has since been echoed by a number of other sites, including some mainstream tech blogs. And I followed it up earlier this year with some examples of progress for 3D Printing, but things have been happening so fast, it’s tricky to cover everything without being able to devote all my time to the subject.

But it’s worth noting another major milestone. In addition to a new Makerbot and a Wired cover story, Makerbot Industries is also opening its first retail location in Manhattan. (via GigaOm).

 

Massive step for 3D Printing:

If this is handled right, it’s a massive step for 3D Printing. It’s something that’s incredibly hard to explain without someone seeing it for themselves, and now people can actually start going and seeing these amazing devices in action.

And importantly, this is somewhere non-geeks and techies can stumble across 3D printing and it can start reaching a broader audience.

With three months left in 2012, I’m thinking that if my timing was slightly out, it’ll have been by months rather than years!

 

 

How the Open Source Makers revolution is continuing…

I’m obviously a big fan of the open source philosophy – in addition to using WordPress as a content platform, I’ve been heavily involved with the Jigoshop open source eCommerce project, worked with Magento for clients including Jigowatt, and take a keen interest in the use of Creative Commons and GPL licensing for content. I’ve also been involved with various other platforms for clients, and tried to get more companies to look at the potential.

But possibly more exciting than open source software and servers are the physical projects and products which are transforming a significant amount of the world already and are poised to make a massive change to all our lives in the future. I’ve mentioned my fascination with 3D printing quite a bit, but one of my favourite projects over the past few years has been the Arduino project.

Check this out:

 

 

If you’re not considering ways to be involved with open source hardware and software, and the implications it has, then you might find you’re not only being left behind by competitors, but by your customers…

And if you do happen to either already be working on stuff, or you’re interested in getting started and ideally located in the Peterborough and East Anglia region – get in touch!

3D Printing in 2012 – innovation coming thick and fast

When I wrote ‘2012 – the year of 3D Printing?‘, I didn’t realise it would quickly become one of my most popular ever posts, get masses of great comments and end up featured on other sites including the Wall Street Journal. But that was back in August,2011, so how are my predictions fairing up now we’re approaching halfway through 2012?

Well, I’d say pretty good – it’s still going to be a while before we see a 3D printer in every home, but the capabilities to make use of them have already arrived, and the hardware itself is getting cheaper. Plus we’re seeing new applications for the technology every week, covering all levels of interest from building hobby parts in your home to creating human veins and body parts for healthcare and industrial applications.

 

No need to design – Scanning tech revolution:

One of the main problems with the concept of 3D Printing on a consumer level is that not everyone is skilled and able to access 3D design software when they need to make something. On a technology level, smaller scanning technology is starting to really move forward, for instance Matterports new, smaller 3D scanner. But even more important could be the new 3D Printing App for the iPad – 123D Catch.

That’s right – you can fully scan any real world object with your iPad and use that captured image to output via a 3D printer. It’s from Autodesk, and allows you to capture and store the design online to then be printed out, or you could send it to a service like Shapeways to print it for you. And the app itself is free!

That means everyone who owns an iPad now owns a full 3D scanning tool which might not be suitable for the most intensive applications, but gives every single person a way to try it.

 

3D Printing hardware falling in price:

I previously covered the likes of MakerBot, which come in at under $2000. But now we’re seeing the likes of RepRap ‘free’ 3D Printer community project, the Kickstarter-project Printrbot which comes in at $549, and now Solidoodle, which combines the worst name of the bunch with a $499 starting price.

That means it’s getting to the same level as an iPad, and for under £1000 you could have the iPad, 3D capture app and 3D printer all set-up and ready to go (Some tweaking and set-up necessary). Under £500 comes into geek impulse buy territory, and also means that you can pay off your investment in a reasonable amount of time without becoming a rapid prototyping company.

 

3D Printing innovation is almost endless:

Just look at a quick sample of the 3D printing news and business that I’ve spotted and saved in the last few months:

Here are the MIT printable robots in action:

 

3D Printing – is 2012 realistic?

I was intentionally a little bit vague when I claimed 2012 would be the year of 3D printing, because I didn’t define exactly what that meant. Would it mean everyone knows what is it? Or owns a 3D printer of their own? Or has one on their Christmas list?

In my mind it was the year the phrase became as understood and accepted as ‘the internet’, ‘iPhone’ or ‘iPad’. And I see no reason yet to become any less optimistic that will be the case by the end of the year – it’s already happened in technology circles, and with the range and scope of innovation, there’s a good chance one or two breakout ideas will have occurred by the time December rolls around – indeed the coverage above includes mainstream publications such as the BBC, so this really isn’t a niche idea anymore.

The question is really how soon you and your business might start actively using 3D Printing, rather than talking about it. And I suspect it won’t be long unless you want to be left behind…

TheWayoftheWeb Most Read Posts in 2011

There’s still a week to go, but unless something radical happens, here’s a quick run-down of the most read posts I’ve written on this site in 2011. It’s purely in terms of visitor numbers via Google Analytics, so I’m resisting the temptation to try and promote posts that I felt may have been overlooked!

1. 2012 The Year of 3D Printing?

If anything, the coverage of 3D printing has only gained pace since I wrote this, and there have been several more developments with funding, new businesses based around the technology, and growing consumer awareness.

2. Problems embedding Youtube videos in WordPress?

With the roll out of new embedding tools from Youtube, Vimeo etc, it turned out that WordPress was stripping out the code whenever you tried to publish an embedded video. It’s since been corrected, but judging by the traffic, it wasn’t just me that was a bit puzzled by the fact I had to revert to the old code.

3. Feeling attacked on all sides

A popular post for freelancers and entrepreneurs which covered my feelings about setting up my own small businesses, and then seeing constant news about competitors and massive global corporations moving into similar areas. How do you work on a tiny marketing business when the ‘big boys’ are constantly unveiling new social media units?

4. Guy Kawasaki’s ‘Enchantment – The art of changing hearts, minds and intentions’

A review from back in February of what I think is one of the most useful books released this year.

5. Everyone’s a curator now

How content curation may be a new buzzword for the media industry, but everyone else is already doing it with their writing, photos and videos. How does that change the way we act with friends and family, or how we upload and share?

6. The two sides of 3D Printing

Two examples of current 3D Printing – one very positive, one perhaps very negative, which hopefully start people thinking how best to utilise the technology in benefitting us all, rather than just being impressed with the tech itself.

7. Why don’t Facebook fans like us anymore?

What turns people away from a company Facebook page, and also how to plan to fix it.

8. Klout and Peerindex: Social network loyalty cards

How Klout and Peerindex are initially mapping ‘influence’, and the result that they act as loyalty cards for the social networks they include, requiring you to do your daily posting on Facebook, Twitter and Google+ rather than using a competitor, for example. Add in the quantity factor as a part of their metrics, plus the perk offers as a reward, and they’re loyalty cards for digital services.

 

And I’d like thank you

I’d just like to give my heartfelt thanks and appreciation to everyone who has visited my site, subscribed to my feed, RT’d, Liked, or +’d a post, left a comment, stumbled, reddit’d, digg’d, or told their friends about TheWayoftheWeb.

Starting a blog or a business is incredibly tough, and sometimes we all forget to share how important it is when we see that someone has enjoyed what we do. I promise you that I still get as excited by seeing new readers, new comments, and new recommendations of what I do today as I did when I first started blogging. And even on the worst days, when I’m working alone at home and feeling like noone cares, it’s guaranteed someone will post a comment or share a post on Twitter, and it’ll fuel my determination and motivation for weeks.

So many thanks, Happy Christmas, and if I can help you in 2012, please do let me know…

Key trends for 2012: Digital Disruption gets Physical

It’s the trend and prediction season, and there’s one overarching theme which ties together the main three technology trends I believe will break into the mainstream in 2012. Over the past decade we’ve seen a huge amount of disruption triggered by increased internet access – both in terms of speed and availability. The access to information and entertainment has had a massive effect on media and entertainment industries, whether through legitimate ways to access content or piracy. And we’ve also seen new tools and changes in collaboration, business practices, marketing, freelancing, crowdsourcing and much more.

But the majority of these changes have all been concerned with the fact you can transmit information and content effortlessly around the world. The key change for 2012 is that three major trends and breakthroughs will have a far bigger impact than ever before on the physical world. All three have been discussed and reported in technology circles for months, years, and in one case, decades, but all of them are reaching that tipping point where ‘normal’ non-geeks are interested and getting to the stage where they will start to invest with their cash.

Trends for 2012 #1: 3D Printing:

Having previously predicted that 2012 will be the year of 3D printing, I have to lead with it. Since writing that post in August (which was one of my most popular), the profile and interest in 3D Printing has only risen. We’re still at the stage where people can find new ways to utilise it every week, whether that’s criminals using it to produce credit card skimmers, the highly debatable use of creating gun parts, or the potentially life enhancing application of 3D printing to create new bones. One of the reasons I love 3D printing so much is that it’s still at the stage where it’s advanced enough to be indistinguishable from magic, but sadly I suspect that era will be over soon, and we’ll see more companies probably publicly demonstrating how they’ve been using it in-house for rapid prototyping etc.

  • In addition to the BBC link above, it’s being featured by the likes of The Economist, highlighting celebrity 3D printer Jay Leno. We’re already entering the cool celebrity endorsement stage.
  • DIY 3D Printers are coming down in price – e.g. $500. OK, so we’re still at the stage where you need to assemble your own kit, but when the existing companies build enough demand and scale, or when you get someone like Samsung or Toshiba in the market, the ability to source parts in massive bulk and package them in something that’s consumer friendly will rapidly change. How long before a bright pink or blue 3D printer covered in cartoon characters is on the shelves of Toys R Us for example?
  • Having seen Makerbot gain funding and more media attention, now Shapeways has raised $5.1 million for the alternative approach of remotely producing whatever designs are sent to them.
  • The tech, the stories and applications are a dream for anyone in marketing – if any 3D Printing company wants to chat to me about the possibilities, I’d definitely be interested. I can’t think of many technologies that have so many simple yet magical ways to entice consumers
  • And there are a number of startups now building their businesses on the platform of 3D printing, for instance, building personalised robot figurines to order, which leads me nicely onto the second trend…

 

Trends for 2012 #2: Robots in the workplace and your home:

Robots have been around for a long time in both science fiction, and in the workplace. As ideas and mechanical automatons, they’ve been around for hundreds of years, and in an industrial setting, they began work in the 1960s. More recently, their military use has skyrocketed – for a detailed look I highly recommend Wired for War by PW Singer, and their use in warehousing and distribution has been documented in various places. So why am I tipping something so old and obvious as a trend for 2012?

  • For one thing – use in the home, and the drop in prices. A basic Roomba robot vacuum cleaner costs £239.99 on Amazon, comparitive to a number of Dysons, for example. Sadly robot lawnmowers are still equivalent to the highest end of the human directed version, but I’d put money on that changing in the near future. And when that happens and you send one out, all your neighbours will suddenly get a prime view of it.
  • And the other is the increased sophistication of their role in the workplace. Korea is trialling robot prison guards, Toyota has unveiled 4 robot health assistants due on the market around 2013, and they’ve already got competition from the Riba healthcare robot due to 2015, amongst others. President Obama has already announced the U.S will fund the Advanced Manufacturing Partnership, which is part of the many efforts to enable robots to interact with humans in their work, rather than simply isolated on a production line doing a very simple task.
  • Again, cost is an issue with a current personal robot costing $400,00. A bit much for personal use, but costs will decrease rapidly – in 1973 the first personal computer cost around $200,000. And in the workplace, more specific requirements and designs lower the cost to the point where investing is a case of direct comparison with a human equivalent. Whether or not you support or use immigration or cheap labour for repetitive tasks, there are still costs involved and potential problems which robots could answer. And given we’re on the cusp of self-replicating robots and machines, 2012 probably won’t see a personal robot butler in every home, but will see more businesses investing in them, and more widespread use of the single-task robot in your personal life.
  • And one element which might help that spread and help the adjustment is the rise of home working and telecommuting, as there has been work and research which leads to the use of robot ‘stand-ins’ for workers away from the office for meetings etc (The same thing still continues in virtual worlds, despite the perception of business ‘failure’ in places such as Second Life – and the use of more traditionally framed virtual collaboration tools could well lead to a resurgence in the future, particularly with more senior executives of an age where virtual worlds in video games are second nature)

 

Trends for 2012 #3: ‘The Internet of Things’

Possibly the clunkiest name for any trend, but fairly self-explanatory when you realise this refers to connected devices. Again, this isn’t a radically new idea, and comes accompanied with references to the internet fridges we all failed to rush out and buy. But that was before the iPad started to replace a recipe book on the kitchen counter, next to the internet-connected radio and the smart phone.

And the key development is that the infrastructure is now available in ever-growing areas – ever-faster broadband, wifi, power lines etc.

  • Consider that the EU has already seen fit to sign a framework for privacy for RFID applications, which power the connectivity.
  • Businesses are already there – remember the warehouse robots from our last trend? RFID. Want to be able to connect all your vehicle assets? RFID. Want to be able to track all your inventory, no matter where it is in the supply chain, down to a single box? RFID.
  • Increasingly we’re controlling more of our lives from a small group of devices – smartphone, tablet, laptop, Kinect etc.
  • There are already a huge number of applications and businesses utilising existing technology, such as Arduino, to allow your plants to message you when they need more water, or your doorbell to text you when someone rings it.
  • And remember the Internet Fridge back in 1999? Well, it’s back and wifi enabled. And given that the likes of Tesco have started using augmented reality to allow you to snap a picture of your groceries on the wall of the underground station while you are waiting to come home, suddenly being able to access what’s in your fridge and what you need to buy when you’re out and about suddenly doesn’t seem quite so daft…
  • If that all seems a bit too far – consider the amount of self-diagnosis being utilised in cars. And imagine the time and frustration saving when your rubbish washing machine is internet connected? This isn’t about using your tumbledryer to surf the web – it’s about saving time and effort when it breaks by contacting the engineers directly to let them order a part and come and fix it, rather than trying to arrange an appointment via a call centre for someone to come and look at it, go away again, and then come back with the right bit to fix it.

 

The implications of 2012′s Physical Disruption

The one outside element which might have an effect on the timescales is the perception of the global economy. I don’t think that will slow 3D printing particularly, as tough economic times tend to see a rise in DIY and self-repair, plus investments in items which are very much about longterm quality and value.

It may be harder for robots to be accepted into the family – they inherently seem more frivolous, even with the argument that the time-saving means more productive work can be done to show a decent return. In the workplace the cost savings are more immediately apparent and the future looks less accessible for anyone in an unskilled manual labour role. Much as the longterm prospects for call centres might start to decline this year, which I don’t think anyone except employees will mourn (Sorry for the few good call centre people I’ve dealt with).

Put simply, 2012 is the tipping point, I believe, for small business of crafted products. I remember watching a presentation video, which I believe was JP Rangaswami (Annoyingly absent in every history and bookmarking tool I use, so I’ll continue to try to locate it), in which he talked about a return to a pre-Industrial Revolution business world, and 2012 seems to be the point where that becomes an increasing reality. Big brands will continue to exist, but already they’re moving to a world in which they retain their size by the interests they own and the backroom elements they can provide more than leading the storefronts and businesses with their brands.

That has positives – at the point were you can save money by printing your own products rather than paying to import them from outsourced manufacturer in Asia. Optimistically, saving on the more menial healthcare tasks may allow for more training and specialisation in more complexity, assuming the NHS isn’t completely destroyed. And a connected house should mean more time to be productive or relaxed.

But it also has scary implications for employment – the easy reassurance is that when the economy improves, everyone will be back in work and everything will be OK. But the effect of digital disruption has been that it creates money, and employment, but in sheer numbers the workforce will always be much smaller than what was replaced, as we increasingly use algorithms instead of humans. Extend that further out into unskilled and semi-skilled professions and we need to rapidly reconsider the education system and the industries which the UK and the world will be pursuing in the future, and how that maps out against the world’s population.

So that’s something to look forward to next year.

The two sides of 3D Printing

Any new technology gets defined by the way it is used, particularly when it comes to deciding whether it is generally a positive or a negative influence. For example, videogames are either portrayed as improving reaction times and problem-solving, or as creating couch potato serial killers. Meanwhile the internet is either a way for the world to connect and share, or a destructive force on our ability to form coherent thoughts.

And in a sign that I might have got my prediction right for 2012 as the year of 3D printer, it seems like the same debate, praise and outrage will be coming to a 3D printer near you very soon, as various use cases are starting to be picked up by increasingly mainstream media.

The nice side of 3D Printing:

Currently representing the nice and lovely side of 3D Printing could be the Origo, which is a concept for a 3D Printer aimed at children, enabling kids everywhere to create real physical interpretations of their imagination. The focus is very much on simplicity, with the description of a product which is about the size of three Xbox 360s, costs about the same as three Xbox 360s, and is quite, easy and simple in the manner of an appliance like a toaster or a microwave.

Sounds pretty good for adults too, considering the need for simple effectiveness to bring 3D Printing into the mainstream, when the concept itself can still be slightly weird for a lot of people. As much as I like more DIY approach, the simple fact is that not only does it limit the number of people willing to experiment with it, but it also means people can relegate it to something for the geeky engineers in life, and therefore ignore it.

“Origo: 3D Printing @ Home” by Artur Tchoukanov from Umeå Institute of Design on Vimeo.

 

The naughty side of 3D Printing

At the same time as we’re sat considering the joy that 3D printing could bring to children, a debate has been breaking out on the Thingiverse site which allows people to share Makerbot projects.

The cause? Two creators have uploaded guides to making parts of an AR-15. The first is an AR-15 Rifle Magazine, which is potentially slightly odd, but is also greatly overshadowed by the presence of an AR-15 Lower Receiver, which is the frame which holds the other parts of the weapon together, and is apparently the only part which requires a background check before purchase in the U.S. The uploader claims he has shared the details as a response to the presence of the magazine, in an attempt to get clarification on what is or isn’t allowed on the site, as there isn’t a clear-cut rule.

AR15LowerReceiver3DPrintingImage

As John Biggs points out in his post on the subject, what’s interesting isn’t whether this particular case is allowed or not – what’s fascinating is that we’re at the point where working parts for weapons can be created by anyone with a 3D printer and the required files. That’s not to say that repairs to the ubiquitous AK-47 haven’t been carried out in the unlikeliest of places for the last 60 years, but suddenly new technology makes it quicker and easier.

It’s not possible yet to print an entire working gun from scratch as far as I’m aware, but it can’t be far away, and what implications does it have for not only weapons manufacturers, but for licensing for gun owners? Or for the availability of weaponry around the world.

Technology doesn’t kill – People do:

It’s an interesting point in the evolution of 3D printing, but it’s also a reminder that has been true for every piece of technology invented in the history of humanity – the way it is used will always be defined by the person using it. We’re getting to the point of algorithms going beyond their creators and self-replicating robots, but we’re not quite there yet.

Whether the internet, videogames, mobile phones or any other technology is good or bad is really meaningless given that all technology is simply subject to the useage of humans, which are inherently both (often at once). After all, at the same time as Call of Duty is sucking up an enormous amount of human endeavour in finding ways to kill each other online, gamers have also solved a problem in Aids research which has puzzled scientists for years. The Philosophy of Technology could be a field that becomes amazingly important in the modern age.

Self-assembling and self-replicating machines?

Part of the discussion about 3D printing was the possibility of self-assembly and self-replication. And as if by magic, this video of MIT research Skylar Tibbits just popped up in my subscription feed. It’s only 6 minutes, and shows that MIT is already well on the road to self-assembling machines possessing computational power…

 

Watching this also makes me wonder what I would have done if projects like this were being shared via Youtube when I was still young and in education? As much as I love and adore what I do for a living, I do wonder why no-one shared the equivalent projects with me at a time when I was as knowledgeable about Physics and Mathematics as English and History.

 

2012 – the year of 3D printing?

It seems like I’ve been talking to people about 3D printing for ages, but it seems like momentum is really gathering for it at the moment as it starts to reach a wider audience, and with the news Makerbot Industries has just secured $10 million of funding.

Frustratingly, and out of character for me, I can’t find a blog post noting when I initially heard about it, although it must have been around 2009, as that was when the initial press reports started appearing, and I do remember being familiar with it before I read the awesome Makers by Cory Doctorow, which I then bought for my dad as a far more inspiring and clearer explanation of the possibilities than I could manage. And in addition to promising myself a Makerbot and Arduino board by the end of the year back in January, I’ve mentioned it to a lot of people over the last few years. In fact, my stock answer when people ask me for any tech prediction or investment tips has been ’3D printing and robotics’. The use of robots is delivering disruption in everything from bomb disposal to warehouse management, and 3D printing is going to have a more immediate impact on manufacturing in the very near future.

And as recently as this afternoon, I was reminded of one of Clarke’s laws – ‘Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic’, as I showed some very digitally savvy and clever people some Youtube videos to explain 3D printing and left them amazed.

One of the best examples is this video showing the manufacture of a wrench (or adjustable spanner in the UK) simply by scanning it in 3D and pressing ‘print’.

And the possibilities are amazing – already people are creating full sized replica motorcycles, working planes, guitars, sculptures, complex gear mechanisms, and a huge range of protyping applications which aren’t even being publicised, although this promo video for a printer gives some idea of the breadth of the options:

And of course, there’s Makerbot’s products, which can be purchased for under £1000 and then sit next to my home PC churning stuff out, before I can progress to the larger models:

Why is 3D Printing about to hit?

A few things seem to be heading towards the perfect 3D printing storm. Early adopters are already talking a lot about the opportunities, including many people I have a lot of time and respect for. The mainstream media are starting to pick up on it again, and explain it in a way which fascinates people. And when you think about the range of promotional merchandise which could be produced, for example, it’s easy to see that a company could actually save a fair amount of money by running their own 3D printer rather than using foreign labour and a intermediary company.

There’s also the financial situation for most people, and times of austerity often lead people to invest in better longterm products and solutions, including buying better quality products which will last, and looking for ways to fix and improve things rather than replacing them. Give me a way to replace all the broken parts of toys in the house, or various gadget parts, and I’ll soon have recovered the purchase price.

Then you’ve got the fact that you can already print 3D chocolate creations – bang goes the chocolatier industry – and Cornell University have already been looking at ways to produce all types of food from basic ‘food inks’, and even human organs and body parts.

It’s hard to imagine how many industries and businesses will be affected, and how quickly the disruption will take place, given the real world implications are far more immediate than even the digital disruption of the internet has managed. There are plenty of people who resisted going online, or didn’t see the benefits – show them a quick, cheap and easy hip replacement that works and has no waiting time and they can see why it’s worth it straight away!

The biggest challenge to 3D printing:

The only challenge to 3D Printing will be the bane of all disruptive digital technology – copyright. Both Makerbot and Fab@Home are open-source projects, and I have no doubt that any attempt to block access to the technology and raw materials of 3D printing will be immediately worked around.

The biggest problem will be whether existing industries can do anything to initiate copyright law not only for replacement parts for their specific products, but also newer ideas. And they’ve got a huge incentive – take motorcycle production, for example, where a £10,000 motorcycle built entirely from new spare parts would cost over £50,000.

3d printing will disrupt the world in the next 12 months

MIT are printing solar cells on pieces of paper, Enrico Dini can print buildings from dust, and the first human vein has already been created with 3d printing.

It’s almost impossible to envisage all the opportunities and implications of what this will bring – and if you’re looking for the easiest and cheapest ways to access the technology, there are already companies like Shapeways that will create whatever you’re able to upload. But although I did once wonder about opportunities for a similar business, it’s really a gateway company as the cost of owning your own production continues to fall to the point where your garden shed is a mini-fabrication facility for anything from paper models to human organs. And considering the cost of a Makerbot Thing-o-Matic is already down to $1299, it’ll be interesting to see how their new investment could lead to even further price reductions in the short term. That’s just from economies of scale etc with the existing technology, and not even accounting for the inevitable improvements in how 3D printers are actually made. Self-replication isn’t exactly unimaginable.

I don’t often gamble on making predictions for something as radically unpredictable as technology and the impact it will have on the world around us, but 3D Printing for me is beyond the introduction of the smartphone, and rivals both the internet, and even the invention of the computer. The question isn’t if it will be the most radical change since the industrial revolution – the only question is when…

Makers by Cory Doctorow

I don’t often review books on here, and I review fiction books even less, but Makers is definitely a worthwhile exception, as Cory Doctorow is well-known both as an author, and for his views and work on copyright and open rights. Although Makers might be a work of fiction, it’s very much written as a parable based on his views.

Before I go into the book itself, it’s worthwhile noting that you can download it for free in almost every conceivable e-format and licensed under Creative Commons from Cory’s site, as well as buying the print version in the normal manner from the usual retailers ( such as Amazon – Makers
aff link). As he has often documented (Including in his non-fiction essay collection, Content), the evidence he has points towards this approach helping him towards increased print sales.

Makers:

Makers follows the progress of a handful of key characters in a near future world, where technology has continued to progress, business strategies have remained the same, but the economy has gotten worse for many people.

Following the fictional merger of Kodak and Duracell, the new boss of Kodacell, Kettlewell, introduces a new scheme to support micro-business, and the first of these are two creative hacker-types, Perry and Lester, working out of a disused Florida mall next to a shantytown, and creating tech and art out of salvaged junk and 3D printers. They’re joined by Suzanne Church, a journalist encouraged to document the story, and Tjan, a business manager flown in by Kettlewell.

MakersbyCoryDoctorow

The book follows the story of their project, and their lives, as they have an effect on the community around them, and indeed the American country – and the effect on them when big business perceives them as a threat.

It’s a great book for anyone with enthusiasm for technology, whether it’s about geek tech, DIY or Steampunk – and it’s also great to pass onto those in your life who might not get your enthusiasm for tech, open source and microbusiness.

But it’s not Open Source propaganda – quite often Lester and Perry can infuriate those around them – and readers – by clinging to their desire to ‘just make things’, and not to embrace the events happening around them, despite the publicity they get from Suzanne’s journalism – which itself develops into a successful self-published business of its own.

A work of fiction and the suspension of disbelief is the reason you don’t see imitators with more of a business angle take over from the pair, until Disney figures late in the story.

The characters in the story are all based within recognisable stereotypes – the overweight geek, the mature female reporter, the youthful CEO and the efficient business manager – but just as in meeting people in real life, they contain personality and character much beyond this.

Overall, it’s an excellent book and page-turner. I downloaded it as a free PDF and ended up forsaking my RSS feed (and this blog), for a couple of days until I’d finished it. If you’re the geeky sort, you’re love the mix of tech invention and the recognisable possible future of the current tech ideals and businesses (and there are plenty of geek jokes in there). And if you’re trying to kickstart some enthusiasm amongst non-geek friends, it’s the perfect fictional introduction – it’s even useful for business owners and managers as a guide to a possible future and a spark for ideas which may work successfully.

Only two negatives (spoiler alert):

Only two short sections left me cold – one was a detailed sex scene (as forewarned in Cory’s introduction to the PDF copy). It wasn’t the sex itself, or the detailed descriptions – it was the fact that it seemed so out of place and jarred with the rest of the book. Maybe the point is that the physical relationships between Perry, Lester and the other characters was so hard for the two hacker geeks to maintain compared to their relationship with technology and their creations, but it really felt as if the 2 or so pages detailing the carnal act were forced in there (pardon the single entendre).

The only other disappointment was the ending, which was a major issue considering the quality of the rest of the book, but it left me somewhat underwhelmed. Not because it was a less than triumphant finish for the people involved, but because the way it was delivered – particularly the ‘hadn’t seen each over in years’ mechanic. Technology has removed this from being as plausible in the modern world, and the events leading up to their separation never seem quite enough to cause an active attempt by the pair to avoid each other (in real life people do drift apart without any effort, but for fiction to make this interesting would take a far longer book and a different angle). It made for an ending which felt more like it a conclusion was needed, than naturally followed the events so far.

Overall? Download it and Buy it!

Minor gripes aside, I really loved Makers, and it’s good enough that the minor gripes are an extremely small price to pay for the rest of the book. If you download the free version from the main Makers website, I’m willing to bet you’ll be buying at least a couple of the print editions for yourself, and for friends and family (Makers
Amazon affiliate link).