• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
TheWayoftheWeb

TheWayoftheWeb

Content and Digital Marketing Specialists

  • Blog
  • The Cipher
  • About Us
    • Useful Resources For Businesses In Peterborough, UK
  • Contact Us
  • Show Search
Hide Search

social networking

Two throwaway thoughts on a Monday

January 26, 2009 By Dan Thornton

Both coming from recent updates on Twitter:

1. If we need proof that people are inherently social, how the hell did everyone find out about fire and the wheel before Mainstream Media? Or Social Networking, Social Media Marketing and Web 2.0 for that matter?

(brilliant response by both @epredator and @dalvado – seeing a wheel rolling past on fire!)

Wheel of Fire 5 by SanGatiche on Flickr (CC Licece)
Wheel of Fire 5 by SanGatiche on Flickr (CC Licece)

2. In a hyperconnected world of broadband and mobiles, will we see a premium on those things which allow us to break away and enjoy solitude – for example, with motorcycling, the supposed thrill of speed became a byproduct for me of experiencing solitude, extreme concentration, and getting close to experiencing ‘flow’.

That thought came from seeing @gapingvoid tweet that in a world of oversupply, ‘hope’ is pretty much the only thing people are willing to pay for.

My Dopplr personal travel report for 2008

January 21, 2009 By Dan Thornton

I’m quite a fan of Dopplr as a way to track my travels, and those of my friends and contacts, so we can improve the chances of meeting up in person.

You may have already heard that they have produced personal reports for each user’s travel in 2008, and seen the Barack Obama one they’ve created as an interesting example.

Barack Obama Dopplr report (Click to enlarge)
Barack Obama Dopplr report (Click to enlarge)

Well, mine has arrived, and although it’s nowhere near as interesting as Obama, or some of my more well-travelled contacts, it’s still cool for me on a personal level. Plus it’s reminded me to put some more effort into adding journeys and switching on the carbon calculation.

Dan Thorntons personal Dopplr 2008 report (Click to enlarge)
Dan Thornton’s personal Dopplr 2008 report (Click to enlarge)

One of my aims for this year should be to get some trips on there which aren’t commuting to London!

Stop grouping and griping – start thinking and doing

December 19, 2008 By Dan Thornton

It’s tempting to think that social media is a good place to be right now – after all, there’s good evidence it’s one of the few areas of growing employment.

There’s also plenty of talk about how it’s going to grow as a low cost/more effective way to engage people, and therefore drive revenue – but also harder to measure. And it can be hard to tell who is bluffing, at least until someone came up with a checklist!

So we spend our time joining groups and chatting with our peers, whether it’s on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, Ning, etc, etc.

But the one question we need to keep asking is whether each group is really worth joining, and whether we’re actually going to have the time and dedication to make a difference.

It’s something I’ll admit to being guilty of. There’s Social Media Mafia, MeasurementCamp, Social Media Club, Social Media Today, P2PR, EverySingleOneofUs,  just off the top of my head, plus Triiibes, which prompted this post when I thought about how much value others are getting from it – and I’m missing because I’ve spread myself out so much. And some groups, such as the Blog Council, are attracting some criticism. As indeed WOMMA has in this case.

Then add in several Facebook groups, a few LinkedIn groups, and others I’ve forgotten – and suddenly it’s sounding ridiculous, even though I’ve increasingly only tried to be involved in groups with a reasonably clear and defined purpose.

Credentials Required by TheTruthAbout... on Flickr (CC Licence)
Credentials Required by TheTruthAbout… on Flickr (CC Licence)

I’ve already started politely resigning from a few places, because I’m barely even remembering to check in and see what’s happening once in a while, let alone contribute to anything of value – from now on it’s about having a real focus on what matters to me personally and for my career, and selecting a smaller collection of key groups who I can offer value to (and perhaps where interlinks can be found).

Perhaps this is what Twitter has really affected for me – in the past I was a pretty active member of a variety of groups and forums, but now they don’t seem so important, as I’ve got an expanding network of over 1900 in my community for instant responses on a variety of topics, rather than forcing myself to go and check in somewhere else.  The common complaint was that it detracted from blogging, but I tend to find the opposite – but I do find myself spending less time at other social locations, unless it’s a real focused community.

Perhaps it’s just me, and the fact I’ve got a great and involving day job, two blogs, and a young family to think about now? I know from forum involvement for a decade that there’s also a cyclical nature to forum membership – the new excitement, the start of seeing repetition from other members, taking a break and then coming back with new enthusiasm etc….

And I do know some people who seem to benefit from seemingly being in almost every group on every network ever created.

But what do you think? Have you been a little guilty of serial group joining without considering the value? Found yourself stretched too thin? Or do you think it’s fine to be a silent member in places on the off chance people might find you and request a connection/contribution?

And where have you found the clearest sense of purpose/best value?

Would you risk telling people not to buy from you?

December 13, 2008 By Dan Thornton

Because that’s a difference between the old world and the new.

I’ve been following the always awesome Gary Vaynerchuk for the while on Twitter, as well as watching his videos at GaryVaynerchuk.com. If you don’t recognise the name, he decided to launch Wine Library TV from his basement, became a major internet celebrity and business success, and now also speaks with authority on what is happening to business and marketing, such as this great appearance at Web 2.0 Expo:

Another great example of how he does things differently to a traditional marketer or businessman appeared on Twitter yesterday:
GaryVaynerchuk

In case the image is too small, he’s actually telling people not to buy from his own company, because he was about to reveal a free shipping code for wine.

Now companies have special offers all the time, especially at the moment, with the economic climate – that isn’t unusual.

  • But how many firms would actively tell people ‘Dont BUY ANYTHING FROM @wldaily ( winelibrary.com) for another 4 1/2 hours’?

In general, they wouldn’t, because it would seem stupid to stop people paying full price while they’re willing, and then to get the boost at a lower price.

But what that misses is the amount of immensely annoyed people who find out they missed out on a special offer by valuing your product enough to pay full price – and by a matter of days, hours, or minutes.

Not only are they likely to be annoyed about your brand in general, but are they likely to pay full retail price ever again if they know you could launch a sale at any second without warning them?

Sure, you might get a higher profit on one purchase, but what will the difference be over a year? five? ten? Especially when they’ll tell everyone they know?

Interesting take-out from new social network research

December 12, 2008 By Dan Thornton

A new report from Netpop Research has some interesting data (and apparently it’s free until Jan 31, 2009 if you register at Netpop). (Hat tip to ReadWriteWeb)

I want to take a look in more detail, but some of the big points:

  • 105 million Americans (76% of broadband users aged 13+) contribute online. 40 million (29%) contribute to social networks.
  • Typical networker is female (57%), 18-29, either employed or studying, and single.
  • On average they connect with 18 people on a one-to-one basis each week and 110 people on a one-to-many basis.
  • Social networkers spend an average of $101 online, non social networks spend $80.
  • Broadband subscribers who don’t contribute to social networks tend to be male (57%), married (57%), and older. They also connect with less than 3 people online per week.

The last group sounds a lot like the stereotypical boss of a large company, which is why it’s so important for communication and ways to demonstrate the value of social networking, communication and conversation. And an extra $21 per person is the kind of information that helps!

I’m downloading the report now for a deeper look.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 9
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Join us…

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter

We only exist to deliver results for your business. So you get fresh Content, expert SEO, engaging Social Media, or a new Website which is right for you – and your customers.

We help you build your brand, reach more customers and increase your revenue

Search

Categories

Creative Commons License
This work by TheWayoftheWeb is provided under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Start growing your business today Contact Us

TheWayoftheWeb

Copyright © 2026· TheWayoftheWeb Ltd. Company Number 08038527. ICO registration: ZB397650