• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
TheWayoftheWeb

TheWayoftheWeb

Content and Digital Marketing Specialists

  • Blog
  • The Cipher
  • About Us
    • Useful Resources For Businesses In Peterborough, UK
  • Contact Us
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Marketing

Tweaking marketing when products are delivered

August 1, 2012 By Dan Thornton

I’ve been meaning to share some practical examples of how marketing should work as an integral part of all areas of a business. Too often people perceive marketing as a cousin of advertising, whereas it should span from initial product or service design and build through to customer use and interaction.

One great example, particularly for anyone selling products online, is what happens when your customer gets a package delivered to their door. Yesterday I happened to receive my first order from the awesome Last Exit to Nowhere, who specialise in T-shirts ‘inspired’ by cool films. Firstly the ordering experience was easy and their website is pretty well designed to display their range and go through the ordering process.

It’s a pretty good package. The outer envelope features their logo, and in addition to the ordered shirts, there are two free Last Exit stickers, a form for sorting any returns, and a fold-out pamphlet I can hand to someone to hint at what presents might be well received.

So this definitely isn’t a criticism, or an example of bad practice, but as with anything, there’s always room for improvement, so I figured it’s worth sharing some suggestions.

First up – the logo and strapline on the outer packaging does mention that the company sells ‘T-shirts and other apparel inspired by killer films’. Whilst I trust 99.99% of all postal and courier staff, I do wonder whether someone might be tempted by that to possibly misplace the contents en route.

Inside is a clear plastic bag containing the shirts, stickers and pamphlet. Having seen the cool outer package, there’s more scope with the inner bag for branding, or for some cool imagery etc. It’s the unwrapping that’s fun, not the postage, and the more it feels like a celebration during that process, the more I’ll be rushing to make another purchase to feel that same excitement again.

The stickers are definitely a good touch – for a low cost in printing and shipping there’s a decent chance the customer will share the brand name with others. The only tweak here is that there’s no need for a quote praising the store, even when it’s from a film director. If I’m plastering my laptop, fridge or anything else with a cool quote or a brand name, I want to be the one who gets to be cool and explain to my friends what it is – too much explanation means I don’t get that pleasure.

The pamphlet is alright – it mentions the ‘Picture of the Month’ competition to win more shirts, social media links and an email address for ideas and suggestions. Plus a phone number so I can get those people who don’t shop online to still buy me something. About the only slight flaw is that the selection was taken as correct of January 2012 – it’s now August 2012, and I know from my own shopping that the range is pretty much identical, so updating that information every quarter would help make it feel a lot more up-to-date.

Good job Last Exit people:

Just to reiterate – Last Exit to Nowhere do a pretty good job of making receiving your order a pleasant experience, and I wrote this to highlight how even a good experience can still be tweaked and improved.

Having yet to actually model my new clothing, I’m pretty confident I’ll be taking a look on a regular basis as I try and purge my wardrobe of old and crap shirts, and I’ve already picked out 2 or 3 for a future order.

How to justify Marketing, User Experience and Psychology in 30 minutes

July 31, 2012 By Dan Thornton

Rather than justifying the role of marketing, and particularly psychology in business success myself, here’s a great video of Rory Sutherland at a Google Zeitgeist event last year.

 

In an era of data analysis and ‘social media scientists’, it helps to remind me why an absolute reliance on data and numbers makes me feel rather uneasy. There’s a belief that somewhere in the numbers is the one ultimate answer that will guarantee business success.

It also underlines the mistake that many companies make in seeing marketing and the customer experience as a low value add-on to the intrinsic value of the product or service they are selling – and how they can compound that mistake by always sacrificing those areas first when looking to cut costs.

It’s why I’d rather think of myself as an aspiring digital marketing psychologist than a scientist.

Open Source is a feature, not a benefit

July 9, 2012 By Dan Thornton

Open source is a wonderful thing. Without it, this blog wouldn’t exist (WordPress) and I wouldn’t have access to a great Photoshop alternative (GIMP), or clients like Jigoshop, for example. We wouldn’t have GNU Linux, Ubuntu, Apache, Drupal, and we’d all be using Internet Explorer without the option to switch to Firefox or Chrome.

But reading Matthew Ingram’s post last week about the lack of adoption for an open Twitter alternatives highlighted the key reason why so few open source projects become mainstream success stories at the level of WordPress or Firefox. It’s because they break probably the biggest rule of marketing, advertising and promotions.

 

Share benefits not features:

If you want people to adopt a service or buy a product, the most effective communication is to highlight the benefits it brings rather than the features.

The fact that a fridge is cold didn’t sell a single product. The fact that you can get fresh food days after you bought it, or a cold beer whenever you want is what makes you buy a fridge.
Fridge

And yet look at the description’s in Mathew’s article – Status.net (actually identi.ca) is the ‘open source Twitter alternative’, whilst Diaspora is the ‘open source Facebook alternative’. And although the Diaspora homepage does a better job of explaining the benefits of community development, certainly both use open source heavily in various descriptions and interviews.

There’s a painful truth here for developers currently flocking to the latest cool open source project on Github.

 

Most people don’t care that it’s Open Source:

A certain group of people will actively seek out projects and products because they wish to support the concept of Open Source, and that’s fine and dandy. A significant number of those people are developers, designers and technology-savvy internet users, and that’s a good core group to have on board, assuming you don’t get into an endless cycle of debates which sap the direction and focus of a project.

But that group is a relatively tiny percentage of the digital world, and most mainstream internet users either haven’t heard of Open Source, or could care less about it.

  • The success of projects such as Apache came when businesses realised the benefits which came from lower costs and more open systems.
  • The success of WordPress came from quick and simple self-hosted online publishing.
  • The success of Jigoshop is because it’s free to set up a full online store and easy to tweak and customise.
  • Arduino lets people learn electronics and build amazing gadgets easily.

There are huge benefits which come from Open Source projects, licensing and businesses – I’m a big advocate of opening up as a necessary way for companies to operate and grow in the future. Having open code means projects don’t die because one company or one developer quits. It allows brilliant people around the world to get involved and means that the end users can find someone who can work with that code relatively easily. It means that things can exist and grow in ways the creators may never have imagined, and can produce weird and varied offshoots. And it allows all sorts of feedback and contributions which create a way extremely small businesses can compete with incredibly large ones.

But these come from developer and user adoption, which is not inherent just by slapping an ‘Open Source’ label on a project. And that’s why many projects struggle – Open Office is an example of a great project which comes close to matching the leading proprietary office software but has yet to be quite as easy to use, or product a unique advantage beyond being open and free.

 

Find the benefit or go home…

Cloning an existing product or service doesn’t work unless you’re the Samwer brothers and have the funds to push it. So if your main pitch is ‘It’s the open source version of …..’, I’d suggest you stop working on it and think of some other ideas.

pujols strikes out

If it’s something which is amazing in some way, and it’s also open source, then you’ve got double the chances of success. Don’t be afraid of promoting the Open Source aspect to the developer community to attract interest, but make sure that’s not the main message going out to mainstream internet users.

And if you’re struggling, get in touch, as I’m happy to take a quick look and make some hopefully helpful suggestions – or to work with you to create the marketing and communication strategy an Open Source project needs as much as any proprietary business.

Why I love writing and technology…

May 2, 2012 By Dan Thornton

…because done well, both can inspire people to act.

Whether it’s laughter or tears, love or hate, making a purchase or revolting against a government – both can provide amazing tools to inspire and encourage.

It’s how I ended up combining writing and marketing.

And it’s why I don’t dream about one day turning this business into an ‘SEO’ agency. Or a ‘social media’ agency.

I dream growing this business into something larger which is known for being able to enable change and action both internally and externally.

And it’s why I also think a lot about how that looks in terms of structure and recruitment.

And both of those issues are likely to become increasingly important this year, so if that’s the sort of thing you might be interested in, please do get in touch. Location won’t be important, but the right ideas will…

Creating categories and definitions by doing, not debating

March 3, 2012 By Dan Thornton

I just read a post by Peep Laja which talked about the old advice of inventing a new category to be able to charge more for your products than just slotting into a predefined definition, followed by a post by Neville Hobson on an attempt to redefine what PR means. And both have reinforced my belief that you only create new categories and redefine existing ones by actually going out and doing stuff.

As much as I can have respect for the people who get caught up in debates about what PR, Social Media Marketing, Content Marketing, Transmedia, SEO, etc all should mean exactly, the simple fact is that noone cares. Seth Godin talked about successful modern marketing beginning with product planning and development, but still many businesses and consumers see marketing as part of advertising.

When I try and define what I do for people, it comes out as:

  • I write for my own projects
  • I write for other people’s projects
  • I market my own projects
  • I market other people’s projects
  • I run training courses in writing and marketing
  • I run training courses in writing and marketing for other people
  • I provide research for my own projects
  • I provide research for other people
  • I host my own websites
  • I provide hosting for other people
  • I manage my own paid advertising campaigns
  • I manage paid advertising campaigns for other people
  • I manage affiliate campaigns for other people
  • Or I do: Writing, Journalism, Blogging, Natural SEO, Paid SEO, PPC, Content Marketing, Social Media Marketing, Training, Tutoring, Affiliate Management, Community Management, Analytics,

Either way, it means I should need the world’s biggest business cards. I don’t.

Dan Thornton business card - AKA TheWayoftheWeb.net and HotModMedia.com
It’s me. And a quick meeting or search tells you more…

 

But actually, what tends to happen is that my client list has grown from referrals from existing clients or from people finding out about me for one area of what I do, and those that are more rewarding for me in terms of enjoyment and financial rewards grow more quickly than areas that I might not favour, so over time my reputation in some areas will naturally build and lead to more focus.

 

Defining what you and your brand do:

Rather than worrying too much about an exact definition, it’s better to have an idea which you and any employees can broadly follow, but also be flexible within. I always loved the idea of my former employers at Absolute Radio, which was that we were ‘a digital entertainment company with audio at it’s core’, and targetted ‘reluctant adults’. That meant we always focused on sound and sound quality first, and always prioritised those people who were incredibly passionate about their interest (music, comedy, sport), but it didn’t matter whether we had an idea for a website, mobile app, radio station, or anything else, as long as it involved the best possible audio and delighted the right people. And in a challenging market for all broadcasters, it seems like they’re doing better than ever.

But noone ever tuned in because of those definitions – they tuned in because they liked what they heard as a result.

Too often I speak to companies who declare that ‘their customers don’t do it that way’ – and it turns out that actually it’s because they don’t allow customers to interact that way for some reason.

Or that customers ‘just don’t get what we’re trying to do’. Or that ‘clients just don’t understand’.

 

Building brands – do stuff, monitor, do more stuff:

You don’t build a brand simply by having logos or mission statements. Those are brand assets. What builds a brand is making stuff available, seeing how people respond and then building on it. Google didn’t define itself as a search engine, it set out to index the world’s information. Apple didn’t say it only made personal computers – it put design into technology, whether it’s a Mac, iPhone or iPad. The legendary production line methods of Ford went from one colour of car to over 1000 different variations for the Ford Transit van alone.

Geek Pride

Obviously to be successful, it’s not enough to be different – the recent demise of Saab is one example of how you can be known for being unusual but still fail due to not managing sales and costs effectively. But that name will still stand out for many years for a lot of people, and it’s easier to optimise a supply chain than to become known for brilliance and character.

Look at Amazon – offering web servers, books and Kindles. Artists such as Hugh McLeod, Tom Fishbourne, or Penny Arcade. Authors like William Gibson. Musicians from Robert Johnson to Hendrix to Skrillex. 37Signals and Wunderlist are as much about design as project management. I’m already incredibly excited about HiutDenim because I know Howies and The Do Lectures.

Put stuff out there and look at the response, using the wealth of data that is available and complimenting it with the right research.

 

Industries and reputations:

Some industries stuggle with their reputation. Obviously banks and bankers aren’t particularly well respected at the moment, and neither are journalists.

At the same time, SEO and Social Media ‘snake oil salesman’ has become a common criticism for digital marketing.

And yet I know brilliant journalists, SEOs and Social Media specialists who are incredibly well-respected and constantly in-demand because they do brilliant things consistently well. I’ve also had meetings with top marketing and SEO agencies which ended in disaster because they seemed to spend all their time talking a good game in public, but not delivering on it directly in a client meeting.

I actually have a couple of lists which are close to my heart – one is a list of companies I’d love to work with, whether as a freelancer or even possibly as a full-time employee because over the years I’ve known them, they always done things brilliantly (I also have a list of companies who seem to squander their potential and wish they’d let me help sort it out).

And I have another list of individuals I’d love to work with on a project at some point – it’s grown to quite a size over the years, with everyone from creative talents to hard-headed business people. And pretty much everyone on the list has worked on multiple projects, sometimes concurrently, but what they’ve done is always interesting or exciting or innovative or profitable – often all four.

The simple fact is that I don’t worry about crap definitions of the industries I nominally work in. And I’ve stopped worrying about being painted with the same brush as the snake oil salesman. If a million people see a great example of content marketing, or social media, or SEO that I’ve been involved in, then that’s far better mechanism for change than debating definitions.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 30
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Join us…

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter

We only exist to deliver results for your business. So you get fresh Content, expert SEO, engaging Social Media, or a new Website which is right for you – and your customers.

We help you build your brand, reach more customers and increase your revenue

Search

Categories

Creative Commons License
This work by TheWayoftheWeb is provided under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Start growing your business today Contact Us

TheWayoftheWeb

Copyright © 2026· TheWayoftheWeb Ltd. Company Number 08038527. ICO registration: ZB397650